you are a true hardcore islamist and will very soon become jihadist suicide bomber..better join isis and get killed and go to jannat..but wat u will do with 20 virgins
I have been following riots in India for decades and there were solutions to mitigate and stop them in the long run. I lived in TN and the Dravidian ideology stopped the RSS on its tracks though they are pouring in money and striving hard to break in. Only if those in the north understood specially Muslims RSS would not be a power as it is now. Hence the situation is similar to the saying in Tamil the tiger has been let inside and now fighting with the tail to pull it out. Hence I ask you what is that Dravidian ideology that stopped the RSS and protected the Muslims which you know? At least let us make a beginning now if you care to know.
Bro you literally talked about everything except for the Remains of the defaced kasi Vishwanath temple wall on which the mosque was built...you literally had that as the main photo of your article
What a concocted false story of a visit to the masjid . We also know ur ideology , supports denigration of kaffir symbols . And honestly ur account seems false and concocted . Falsely written to appeal as usual to ur western and other masters . U lack integrity , nobody believes ur account . Another last minute falsehood .
Thank your stars you are living in India where people following all religions can visit Hindu holy cities. Kafirs can't even visit Makka and Medina. Now imagine how Hindus feel when they see a mosque straddled on the holiest of holy shrines of Hindus.
mosque isnt scared thing for muslims... it can be destroyed and rebult but it isnt same case with temple if u guys keep identify as son/daughter of Aurangzeb u deserve hate probably *3@th
Did you notice the architecture of mosque walls ? Ask yourself if they are islamic structures or the last signs of the islamic dominance and intolerance ? What is wrong if we want to claim what is rightfully ours ? Just because 300 years have passed that doesn't make your illegal occupation legitimate. Right ?
Almost every major mandir in India is covered with wire and has been installed with some kind of security it could be army personals or just a camera and also people are not allowed to take electronic items inside so that is not something new for Hindus. This kind of government involvement is common for Hindus but Muslims has always tried to autonomously command their religious body and don't like others involvement especially involvement of people of different religion. Maybe that's why you find it threatening and you are just reading too much into. Coming to the wazu-khana and shivling discovery, shivling was submersed in pool and it is situated at substantial depth no doubt nobody saw it.
To compare the calmness of the masjid vs the chaos at the mandir is pretty weak. A truly religious God loving devotee would see every person as a human being first. The mandir is not being built but it is being rebuilt there is a difference. India is an ancient country predating Islam. Hindu gods roamed India and the surrounding countries and the country where a majority of Hindus reside simply want to restore their ancient temples. No one is talking about disrespecting an entire faith. Your piece was poorly written with bias bleeding throughout without any sympathy or empathy for those who wish to see kashi restored to its rightful historic accurate precise location.
Totally biased view..... If people like you who are educated talk like this type of nonsense than your society never became successful...... Now everything is clear in court comissioner report and videoographic evidence that there is a shivling in wazu khana. Knowing this fact of your still try to advocate this type of narative which is totally illogical and false than no body can do nothing..... Bhaichaara sirf dikhave ka hai..... Dil mai gand bhari padi hai
It is clear as day that the mosque is build over a temple with Nandi still present. Islamists have over the centuries taken great pride in building their mosques over destroyed places of worship of other religions and treating the remains as trophy of subjugation. Well meaning Muslims who want communal harmony acknowledge these historical errors and support returning these sites to Hindus, while islamists want to carry on the gory tradition of temple destruction. Forget the shivling even, do you deny that the structures of an old temple including Nandi are still present and the mosque was built over the destroyed temple Rana Ayyub?
Bastard any katmullas who says it is mosque you have yourself. Shown a picture of Hindu architecture . Aurangzeb madarchod had done a shady job by still leaving walls of Hindu temple while destroying temple .
Madarchodon ande ho kya saf saf dikh raha hain tumhare haathkande .
Behen ke lodo Mandir tod ke masjid baanaye aur ab Randi rona karte ho . Tumhare Mecca ko tod ke Mandir banaye kya tab to
Let´s get free of the politically correct mumble jumble.
Islam is violent because its founder was violent and the Quran he wrote justifies violence (specially against infidels - the "vilest of creatures") according to the Quran.
Take the gory beheadings that shocks us when depicted in gory IS videos, for instance. The Quran advocates those beheadings. Those IS fighters didn´t invent the passages of the Quran they quote to justify it. It was Muhammad who instructed them to "strike off their heads" (Quran, 8:12), not the "extremist islamists".
Other things that the Quran justifies include:
sex slaves
wife beating
suicide attacks
sex with minors
stealing from infidels
money extortion from other religions
The Hadith, the second most sacred book for muslins, is even worse. It describes in graphic detail how Muhammad tortured a Jew, took his property and raped the widow. He encouraged, according to the Hadith, the rape of women in front of their husbands and fathers. All that from the man the Quran says is the highest standard of character.
The Old Testament has violent passages as well, but they are not open-ended orders as "O you who believe! Fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you and let them find in you hardness" (Quran, 9:123) or "I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them" (Quran, 8:12).
For these, the mere suggestion of moral equivalence between the Islam and Christianity or Judaism is extremely offensive to Christians and Jews who bothered to read the Bible, the Torah and the Quran.
you are a true hardcore islamist and will very soon become jihadist suicide bomber..better join isis and get killed and go to jannat..but wat u will do with 20 virgins
I have been following riots in India for decades and there were solutions to mitigate and stop them in the long run. I lived in TN and the Dravidian ideology stopped the RSS on its tracks though they are pouring in money and striving hard to break in. Only if those in the north understood specially Muslims RSS would not be a power as it is now. Hence the situation is similar to the saying in Tamil the tiger has been let inside and now fighting with the tail to pull it out. Hence I ask you what is that Dravidian ideology that stopped the RSS and protected the Muslims which you know? At least let us make a beginning now if you care to know.
Bro you literally talked about everything except for the Remains of the defaced kasi Vishwanath temple wall on which the mosque was built...you literally had that as the main photo of your article
What a concocted false story of a visit to the masjid . We also know ur ideology , supports denigration of kaffir symbols . And honestly ur account seems false and concocted . Falsely written to appeal as usual to ur western and other masters . U lack integrity , nobody believes ur account . Another last minute falsehood .
Thank your stars you are living in India where people following all religions can visit Hindu holy cities. Kafirs can't even visit Makka and Medina. Now imagine how Hindus feel when they see a mosque straddled on the holiest of holy shrines of Hindus.
mosque isnt scared thing for muslims... it can be destroyed and rebult but it isnt same case with temple if u guys keep identify as son/daughter of Aurangzeb u deserve hate probably *3@th
Did you notice the architecture of mosque walls ? Ask yourself if they are islamic structures or the last signs of the islamic dominance and intolerance ? What is wrong if we want to claim what is rightfully ours ? Just because 300 years have passed that doesn't make your illegal occupation legitimate. Right ?
Almost every major mandir in India is covered with wire and has been installed with some kind of security it could be army personals or just a camera and also people are not allowed to take electronic items inside so that is not something new for Hindus. This kind of government involvement is common for Hindus but Muslims has always tried to autonomously command their religious body and don't like others involvement especially involvement of people of different religion. Maybe that's why you find it threatening and you are just reading too much into. Coming to the wazu-khana and shivling discovery, shivling was submersed in pool and it is situated at substantial depth no doubt nobody saw it.
To compare the calmness of the masjid vs the chaos at the mandir is pretty weak. A truly religious God loving devotee would see every person as a human being first. The mandir is not being built but it is being rebuilt there is a difference. India is an ancient country predating Islam. Hindu gods roamed India and the surrounding countries and the country where a majority of Hindus reside simply want to restore their ancient temples. No one is talking about disrespecting an entire faith. Your piece was poorly written with bias bleeding throughout without any sympathy or empathy for those who wish to see kashi restored to its rightful historic accurate precise location.
Totally biased view..... If people like you who are educated talk like this type of nonsense than your society never became successful...... Now everything is clear in court comissioner report and videoographic evidence that there is a shivling in wazu khana. Knowing this fact of your still try to advocate this type of narative which is totally illogical and false than no body can do nothing..... Bhaichaara sirf dikhave ka hai..... Dil mai gand bhari padi hai
It is clear as day that the mosque is build over a temple with Nandi still present. Islamists have over the centuries taken great pride in building their mosques over destroyed places of worship of other religions and treating the remains as trophy of subjugation. Well meaning Muslims who want communal harmony acknowledge these historical errors and support returning these sites to Hindus, while islamists want to carry on the gory tradition of temple destruction. Forget the shivling even, do you deny that the structures of an old temple including Nandi are still present and the mosque was built over the destroyed temple Rana Ayyub?
Randi Ayub Zakir Naik has himself confirmed that see the tweet you will have fun and all K2was too
https://mobile.twitter.com/BefittingFacts/status/1530180225640075264
Bastard any katmullas who says it is mosque you have yourself. Shown a picture of Hindu architecture . Aurangzeb madarchod had done a shady job by still leaving walls of Hindu temple while destroying temple .
Madarchodon ande ho kya saf saf dikh raha hain tumhare haathkande .
Behen ke lodo Mandir tod ke masjid baanaye aur ab Randi rona karte ho . Tumhare Mecca ko tod ke Mandir banaye kya tab to
Tum convert katmullon ko aag lagege .
Mandir wapas karo aur bhonkna band Karo
Source:quora
Why is Islam such a violent religion?
Let´s get free of the politically correct mumble jumble.
Islam is violent because its founder was violent and the Quran he wrote justifies violence (specially against infidels - the "vilest of creatures") according to the Quran.
Take the gory beheadings that shocks us when depicted in gory IS videos, for instance. The Quran advocates those beheadings. Those IS fighters didn´t invent the passages of the Quran they quote to justify it. It was Muhammad who instructed them to "strike off their heads" (Quran, 8:12), not the "extremist islamists".
Other things that the Quran justifies include:
sex slaves
wife beating
suicide attacks
sex with minors
stealing from infidels
money extortion from other religions
The Hadith, the second most sacred book for muslins, is even worse. It describes in graphic detail how Muhammad tortured a Jew, took his property and raped the widow. He encouraged, according to the Hadith, the rape of women in front of their husbands and fathers. All that from the man the Quran says is the highest standard of character.
The Old Testament has violent passages as well, but they are not open-ended orders as "O you who believe! Fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you and let them find in you hardness" (Quran, 9:123) or "I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them" (Quran, 8:12).
For these, the mere suggestion of moral equivalence between the Islam and Christianity or Judaism is extremely offensive to Christians and Jews who bothered to read the Bible, the Torah and the Quran.
This guy is mc have potentiality to become a Isis Jihad why you are in a a journalism field directly join in a jihadi group and get your jannat
Assalamu alaikum.can u share with us the model to stop cheddi gang's ideology t